Project Red Team - reviewer audit pack
Regional Sports and Events Complex — Economic Impact (free-data path) :root { --ink: #1a1d21; --ink-soft: #4a5158; --ink-faint: #8b939b; --p
The audit object's own summary line
not release-safe: at least one check failed and the headline claims should not travel yet.
Audit reading: release status not release-safe; 122 claims inventoried; 3 evidence items not found; 1 finding contradicted by the document; 0 reading limits on the file; 130 evidence observations.
This pack and the board memo are rendered from one reading of one audit object. The line above appears in both and in the release proof; if the three ever differ, the pack is broken and not merely disputed.
Detector Status And Measured Limits
| Measure | Value and limit |
|---|---|
| Detector mode | learned model plus rules |
| Held-out recall | 76% |
| Representative-sample precision | 57% (about 4 in 10 flags were not what was sought) |
| Pooled precision | 82%, which is too flattering as a field rate. A second, pooled precision figure of 82% exists and is not the one to use here: it mixes an exhaustive positive-find pass into the representative sample, so it describes a set of sentences no count in this pack was drawn from. It is quoted in this pack only so that a reader who meets it elsewhere knows which of the two figures applies. |
| Observed document recall | 67% to 87%; intervals overlap and variation by document is not established |
| Lexicon limit | Presence checks are word lists and word lists miss phrasings. Against a document we could check line by line, 3 of 12 presence checks returned a false negative. A negative result is 'we did not find it', never 'it is not there'. |
| Human review | required before any finding here is treated as a conclusion about the study |
Measured on the shipped audit predicate (rules/exemplar scorer plus the learned detector), on 3 held-out studies chosen by document hash: finds 76% of labelled qualifications. On the representative held-out sample it flagged 14 sentences and 6 were false positives, so about 4 in 10 flags were not qualifications; pooling the exhaustive positive-find pass with that sample gives 82% precision, which is useful but too flattering as a field-rate estimate. Observed document recalls ranged 67%-87%, but the intervals overlap; current evidence does not prove recall varies by house style. Cross-study comparison therefore needs the same extraction basis and a rank-stability check, not just raw counts.
A count in this pack may be set against another study's count only where three things hold: both were extracted on the same basis, the detector's measured error is printed beside both, and the ordering survives resampling. Where the ordering does not survive, we publish the band and the reason for it instead of a rank.
What Each Finding In This Pack Rests On
Architecture rule 6 of this engine: an audit may say it did not find something; it may not say the study omitted it unless the document contradicts itself or a human reviewer confirms the absence. The last column is that rule applied to this run.
| Section | Basis | What it establishes | May be stated as an absence in the study |
|---|---|---|---|
| not found | our detector did not match it | Our detector did not match the support in the document as submitted. That is a result about our reading and not about the study: the detector reads for known phrasings, studies phrase things in ways no word list anticipates, and the finding closes the moment somebody points at the passage. | no |
| contradicted | text the document contains works against it | Text the document does contain works against a claim the document makes. It rests on a positive match, so it survives the detector's recall limit and a reader cannot close it by finding a passage we overlooked. | yes |
Source Status
audit-safe: HTML; plain-text extraction; 1,986 text lines; 41 tables; 100% text extraction quality; HTML table markup supplied; 100% source readiness
This source arrived as markup and its text was read in full. 41 tables arrived already structured, so the audit read them as the document laid them out.
Five separate readings are being reported here and the summary line above carries three: text extraction quality, table reconstruction coverage, and the source readiness the two combine into. All three measure the file. Fourth, claim detection coverage, which measures our detector instead and is not a percentage of this document: what is measured is 76% recall and about 4 in 10 flags not what was sought, taken on held-out studies, and it is stated with the rest of the run limits rather than here. A detection percentage for this document would need a count of what the study contains, which is the number this audit does not assert about any document.
Fifth, quote safety: the file was read as text, so document text reproduced in this pack is the submitted file's own wording, character for character. This is the only one of the five about what may be repeated rather than about how much was legible, and every table in this pack that reproduces document text says beside each row what that row's text is.
A source's state is not support for a number. Whether this study could reach a source (route ready), whether the source answered when something asked it (endpoint answered), and how much of a submitted file could be read are facts about a configuration, a publisher and a document. A figure is supported only where a reading pulled into the evidence record carries it, with its own claim, vintage and consequence.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Source file | prt-synth-study.html |
| Source kind | HTML |
| Source SHA-256 | 3f30c7ac85181e3f44508990e29e4eeb2672634c173662c3e9a2f59a4f868f1a |
| Extraction method | plain-text extraction |
| Source status | audit-safe |
| Source readiness | 100% source readiness on a 0-to-1 scale, combining the text and structure checks into the release status above |
| Text extraction quality | 100% text extraction quality on a 0-to-1 scale. This is about whether the words were readable, not whether the study is correct |
| Table reconstruction coverage | not applicable for this source type |
| Pages | 0 |
| Tables | 41 |
| Text lines | 1986 |
| Table lines | 0 |
| Notes | not recorded |
| Summary | audit-safe: HTML; plain-text extraction; 1,986 text lines; 41 tables; 100% text extraction quality; HTML table markup supplied; 100% source readiness |
Study Profile
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | Regional Sports and Events Complex — Economic Impact (free-data path) :root { --ink: #1a1d21; --ink-soft: #4a5158; --ink-faint: #8b939b; --p |
| Source file | prt-synth-study.html |
| Study type as detected | mixed |
| Sector archetype as detected | real_estate |
| Geography | national |
| Model named by the study | RIMS II |
| Model year | not recorded |
| Dollar year | 2024 |
| Models detected in the text | RIMS II, input-output |
Not Found In The Document As Submitted
Everything in this section is a miss by our detector, not an absence in the study. The detector reads for known phrasings and studies phrase things in ways no list anticipates. Read each line as "we did not find it", and close it by pointing us at the passage.
| ID | Gate | Weight | Finding | Detector's account | Consequence | What would close it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| missing_public_cost_side | fiscal_truth_gate | blocking | Our detector did not match this in the document as submitted: Public service costs, abatements, incentives, or other cost-side fiscal evidence. | Tax or fiscal revenue appears without a detected public cost-side ledger. | Gross tax revenue may be mistaken for net fiscal benefit. | Point the audit at public service costs, abatements, incentives, or other cost-side fiscal evidence in the full report. |
| missing_model_year | model_vintage_gate | blocking | Our detector did not match this in the document as submitted: Model year or data year. | RIMS II is named, but no model/data year was detected. | Model structure may not match the spending period. | Point the audit at model year or data year in the full report. |
| missing_tax_retention_or_netting | tax_gross_vs_net_gate | blocking | Our detector did not match this in the document as submitted: Gross-vs-net tax treatment and retention/abatement assumptions. | Tax revenue appears without gross/net or tax-retention language. | A gross tax collection can be mistaken for fiscal benefit to the decision maker. | Point the audit at gross-vs-net tax treatment and retention/abatement assumptions in the full report. |
Where These Checks Have Already Missed A Real Disclosure
These are misses this detector has actually made on published economic impact studies. Each was found afterwards by hand, in text this same extraction had already recovered. They are printed beside the rows above so a reader can see what a not-found row is worth before acting on one. The studies are unnamed because the error in each case was ours.
| Check | What it reads for | What a published study wrote instead | What that made this pack say |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the tax figure is gross collections or money this jurisdiction keeps | Gross-versus-net or retention language in the same sentence as a tax figure. | “fiscal benefits (in the form of gross tax receipts) for Bexar County”, with the labelling clause in one sentence and the dollar figure in the next. | This check accepts the words “gross tax” and failed the document anyway, because only the sentence carrying the dollar figure falls inside the window it reads. |
| Whether the tax figure is a net gain to the public purse | Cost-side or net-fiscal language near a tax claim. | A table headed “Detailed Net Fiscal Impacts by Level of Gov.”, with a net position by level of government tabulated under it. | This pack listed the cost side as not found. The net fiscal impacts were tabulated under a heading the tax-claim window does not reach. |
What a not-found row above is worth, and what it is not
What is withheld. The claim that the study does not do this. An unmatched presence check is reported as not matched, and never as evidence about whether the document carries that discipline.
Why. Presence detection is a set of word lists, and word lists miss phrasings. Pointed at the one document we could check line by line — our own report — these lists returned three false negatives in twelve checks. Caveat detection missed “multipliers can lead to illusory results, and thus must be used with great care”. Each miss was fixed by widening a list, which is exactly the repair that does not generalize: the next document phrases it a fourth way.
What can still be used. Every positive match, which is genuine evidence that the document does the thing, and the unmatched list as a reading queue. Those are the passages a human reviewer should open first, and that is what this instrument is for.
What would clear it. A person reading the named section of the document. Presence detection is a triage instrument built to hand its negatives to a reviewer rather than to resolve them, so review is the designed resolution rather than a fallback.
What this does not mean. That the study omitted it. A quarter of the presence checks were wrong on the first real document they met, and every one of those errors ran in this direction — reporting an absence that was not there.
Counted by detector: 76% recall on held-out studies, about 4 in 10 flags not what was sought, and per-document recall observed across 67% to 87% with overlapping intervals. Full limits are stated above.
Contradicted By Text The Document Contains
Everything in this section rests on text the study does contain. These are not misses: the document's own disclosure works against the claim attached to it, so they survive the detector's recall limit and a reader cannot close them by finding a passage we overlooked.
| ID | Gate | Weight | Finding | Detector's account | Where in the document | Consequence | What would close it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| weak_survey_coverage | survey_adequacy_gate | caution | Survey response coverage appears weak. | Survey coverage appears weak: 7 of 39 responses were detected. | No quotation or table reference was recorded for this finding, so it may be acted on as our reading of the document and may not be quoted as though a passage had been reproduced here. What was matched is stated with the finding; the run did not keep the text it was matched in. | Primary inputs may be directionally biased or too sparse for the claimed precision. | Only the study's authors close this, by revising the claim or showing why the document's own disclosure supports it. |
Reading Limits On The Submitted File
This section is about our reading of the file you sent us, not about the study's contents. A thin extraction lowers what any finding below is worth, in both directions.
No finding of this kind was recorded.
Claim Inventory
Confidence is extraction confidence - how sure the audit is that it read the figure and its context correctly. It is not a judgment about whether the figure is right.
| ID | Metric | Value | Extraction confidence | Source clue | Snippet | Quote safety |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| claim:001 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $4.0M | medium | same sentence | Regional Sports and Events Complex — Economic Impact (free-data path) Whether a $4.0M county contribution is recovered through the revenue the facility generates. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:002 | Jobs | 35 jobs | medium | same sentence | Where the wages land, by band and by household — which is not a share of anyone's profit and not a distribution to anyone's members Residents of the host community, and whoever speaks for them Examined — 35 jobs placed across 5 income bands, averaging 74% of the regional median wage. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:003 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $5.4M | medium | same sentence | Summary of findings $5.4M Annual Operations — annual output every year at full operation 35.0 Annual Operations — jobs supported recurring while operating; direct, indirect and induced $8.0M Construction — one-time output total over the build period 26.1 Construction — job-years temporary, not permanent positions $340... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:004 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $8.0M | medium | same sentence | Summary of findings $5.4M Annual Operations — annual output every year at full operation 35.0 Annual Operations — jobs supported recurring while operating; direct, indirect and induced $8.0M Construction — one-time output total over the build period 26.1 Construction — job-years temporary, not permanent positions $340... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:005 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $340,912 | medium | same sentence | Summary of findings $5.4M Annual Operations — annual output every year at full operation 35.0 Annual Operations — jobs supported recurring while operating; direct, indirect and induced $8.0M Construction — one-time output total over the build period 26.1 Construction — job-years temporary, not permanent positions $340... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:006 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $2.1M | medium | near table/figure reference | 28% of its demand is spending the region would have seen anyway, so $2.1M of gross output was removed before any figure above was computed, and $5.4M is what remains. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:007 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $5.4M | medium | near table/figure reference | 28% of its demand is spending the region would have seen anyway, so $2.1M of gross output was removed before any figure above was computed, and $5.4M is what remains. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:008 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $58.8M | medium | same sentence | Over the 2026–2037 horizon the project generates $58.8M in total regional output undiscounted, or $47.0M in present value at 4.0%. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:009 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $47.0M | medium | same sentence | Over the 2026–2037 horizon the project generates $58.8M in total regional output undiscounted, or $47.0M in present value at 4.0%. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:010 | Jobs | 35.0 jobs | high | near table/figure reference | Once construction ends and operations reach full capacity, the recurring level is 35.0 jobs — the figure a community experiences year after year, and the one that should anchor any long-run expectation. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:011 | Jobs | 35 jobs | high | near table/figure reference | Figure Size Against How big that is What it says Annual Operations: jobs supported, per year 35 jobs all jobs in Illustrative County 20,000 jobs The project accounts for 0.17% of all jobs in Illustrative County. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:012 | Jobs | 20,000 jobs | high | near table/figure reference | Figure Size Against How big that is What it says Annual Operations: jobs supported, per year 35 jobs all jobs in Illustrative County 20,000 jobs The project accounts for 0.17% of all jobs in Illustrative County. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:013 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $2.3M | medium | same sentence | Annual Operations: value added, per year $2.3M the whole economy of Illustrative County (value added, which is what a county's GDP measures) $1.85B The project accounts for 0.13% of everything Illustrative County produces in a year. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:014 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $1.85B | medium | same sentence | Annual Operations: value added, per year $2.3M the whole economy of Illustrative County (value added, which is what a county's GDP measures) $1.85B The project accounts for 0.13% of everything Illustrative County produces in a year. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:015 | Jobs | 241 jobs | medium | same sentence | The project is smaller than every industry in this region: the smallest, Manufacturing, supports 241 jobs against the project’s 35. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:016 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $5.4M | medium | same sentence | Annual Operations: output, $5.4M What is withheld. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:017 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $11.2bn | high | near table/figure reference | That report headlined an $11.2bn increase in the size of a state's economy where its own value added was $6.96bn, a 61% overstatement produced by swapping one word, in a table whose gloss on the output row read that GDP is a measure of the overall size of the economy. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:018 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $6.96bn | high | near table/figure reference | That report headlined an $11.2bn increase in the size of a state's economy where its own value added was $6.96bn, a 61% overstatement produced by swapping one word, in a table whose gloss on the output row read that GDP is a measure of the overall size of the economy. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:019 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $2.3M | high | near table/figure reference | Value added is the comparable figure, and it is anchored above at $2.3M. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:020 | Jobs | 26 job-years | medium | same sentence | Construction: 26 job-years What is withheld. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:021 | Labor income | $0.333 | medium | same sentence | The ratio itself is on the record: $0.333 of local consumption per $1.00 of local labor income, taken from the household column of the regional accounts rather than assumed. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:022 | Labor income | $1.00 | medium | same sentence | The ratio itself is on the record: $0.333 of local consumption per $1.00 of local labor income, taken from the household column of the regional accounts rather than assumed. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:023 | Labor income | $5.9M | medium | same sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $5.9M $5.9M Output — Indirect: $1.0M $1.0M Output — Induced: $1.1M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $2.0M $2.0M Labor income — Indirect: $330k Labor income — Induced: $384k $2.7M Value added Value added — Direct: $2.3M $2.3M Value added — Indirect: $410k V... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:024 | Labor income | $1.0M | medium | same sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $5.9M $5.9M Output — Indirect: $1.0M $1.0M Output — Induced: $1.1M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $2.0M $2.0M Labor income — Indirect: $330k Labor income — Induced: $384k $2.7M Value added Value added — Direct: $2.3M $2.3M Value added — Indirect: $410k V... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:025 | Labor income | $1.1M | medium | same sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $5.9M $5.9M Output — Indirect: $1.0M $1.0M Output — Induced: $1.1M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $2.0M $2.0M Labor income — Indirect: $330k Labor income — Induced: $384k $2.7M Value added Value added — Direct: $2.3M $2.3M Value added — Indirect: $410k V... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:026 | Labor income | $8.0M | medium | same sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $5.9M $5.9M Output — Indirect: $1.0M $1.0M Output — Induced: $1.1M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $2.0M $2.0M Labor income — Indirect: $330k Labor income — Induced: $384k $2.7M Value added Value added — Direct: $2.3M $2.3M Value added — Indirect: $410k V... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:027 | Labor income | $2.0M | medium | same sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $5.9M $5.9M Output — Indirect: $1.0M $1.0M Output — Induced: $1.1M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $2.0M $2.0M Labor income — Indirect: $330k Labor income — Induced: $384k $2.7M Value added Value added — Direct: $2.3M $2.3M Value added — Indirect: $410k V... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:028 | Labor income | $330k | medium | same sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $5.9M $5.9M Output — Indirect: $1.0M $1.0M Output — Induced: $1.1M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $2.0M $2.0M Labor income — Indirect: $330k Labor income — Induced: $384k $2.7M Value added Value added — Direct: $2.3M $2.3M Value added — Indirect: $410k V... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:029 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $384k | medium | same sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $5.9M $5.9M Output — Indirect: $1.0M $1.0M Output — Induced: $1.1M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $2.0M $2.0M Labor income — Indirect: $330k Labor income — Induced: $384k $2.7M Value added Value added — Direct: $2.3M $2.3M Value added — Indirect: $410k V... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:030 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $2.7M | medium | same sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $5.9M $5.9M Output — Indirect: $1.0M $1.0M Output — Induced: $1.1M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $2.0M $2.0M Labor income — Indirect: $330k Labor income — Induced: $384k $2.7M Value added Value added — Direct: $2.3M $2.3M Value added — Indirect: $410k V... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:031 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $2.3M | medium | same sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $5.9M $5.9M Output — Indirect: $1.0M $1.0M Output — Induced: $1.1M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $2.0M $2.0M Labor income — Indirect: $330k Labor income — Induced: $384k $2.7M Value added Value added — Direct: $2.3M $2.3M Value added — Indirect: $410k V... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:032 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $410k | medium | same sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $5.9M $5.9M Output — Indirect: $1.0M $1.0M Output — Induced: $1.1M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $2.0M $2.0M Labor income — Indirect: $330k Labor income — Induced: $384k $2.7M Value added Value added — Direct: $2.3M $2.3M Value added — Indirect: $410k V... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:033 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $456k | medium | same sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $5.9M $5.9M Output — Indirect: $1.0M $1.0M Output — Induced: $1.1M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $2.0M $2.0M Labor income — Indirect: $330k Labor income — Induced: $384k $2.7M Value added Value added — Direct: $2.3M $2.3M Value added — Indirect: $410k V... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:034 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $3.2M | medium | same sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $5.9M $5.9M Output — Indirect: $1.0M $1.0M Output — Induced: $1.1M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $2.0M $2.0M Labor income — Indirect: $330k Labor income — Induced: $384k $2.7M Value added Value added — Direct: $2.3M $2.3M Value added — Indirect: $410k V... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:035 | Labor income | $5.9M | medium | same sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $5.9M $1.0M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income $2.0M $329,963 $384,143 $2.7M Value added $2.3M $409,987 $455,935 $3.2M Employment 16.8 4.1 5.2 26.1 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 17 of these. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:036 | Labor income | $1.0M | medium | same sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $5.9M $1.0M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income $2.0M $329,963 $384,143 $2.7M Value added $2.3M $409,987 $455,935 $3.2M Employment 16.8 4.1 5.2 26.1 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 17 of these. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:037 | Labor income | $1.1M | medium | same sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $5.9M $1.0M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income $2.0M $329,963 $384,143 $2.7M Value added $2.3M $409,987 $455,935 $3.2M Employment 16.8 4.1 5.2 26.1 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 17 of these. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:038 | Labor income | $8.0M | medium | same sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $5.9M $1.0M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income $2.0M $329,963 $384,143 $2.7M Value added $2.3M $409,987 $455,935 $3.2M Employment 16.8 4.1 5.2 26.1 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 17 of these. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:039 | Labor income | $2.0M | medium | same sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $5.9M $1.0M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income $2.0M $329,963 $384,143 $2.7M Value added $2.3M $409,987 $455,935 $3.2M Employment 16.8 4.1 5.2 26.1 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 17 of these. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:040 | Labor income | $329,963 | medium | same sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $5.9M $1.0M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income $2.0M $329,963 $384,143 $2.7M Value added $2.3M $409,987 $455,935 $3.2M Employment 16.8 4.1 5.2 26.1 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 17 of these. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:041 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $384,143 | medium | same sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $5.9M $1.0M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income $2.0M $329,963 $384,143 $2.7M Value added $2.3M $409,987 $455,935 $3.2M Employment 16.8 4.1 5.2 26.1 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 17 of these. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:042 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $2.7M | medium | same sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $5.9M $1.0M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income $2.0M $329,963 $384,143 $2.7M Value added $2.3M $409,987 $455,935 $3.2M Employment 16.8 4.1 5.2 26.1 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 17 of these. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:043 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $2.3M | medium | same sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $5.9M $1.0M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income $2.0M $329,963 $384,143 $2.7M Value added $2.3M $409,987 $455,935 $3.2M Employment 16.8 4.1 5.2 26.1 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 17 of these. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:044 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $409,987 | medium | same sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $5.9M $1.0M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income $2.0M $329,963 $384,143 $2.7M Value added $2.3M $409,987 $455,935 $3.2M Employment 16.8 4.1 5.2 26.1 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 17 of these. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:045 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $455,935 | medium | same sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $5.9M $1.0M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income $2.0M $329,963 $384,143 $2.7M Value added $2.3M $409,987 $455,935 $3.2M Employment 16.8 4.1 5.2 26.1 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 17 of these. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:046 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $3.2M | medium | same sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $5.9M $1.0M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income $2.0M $329,963 $384,143 $2.7M Value added $2.3M $409,987 $455,935 $3.2M Employment 16.8 4.1 5.2 26.1 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 17 of these. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:047 | Labor income | $4.0M | medium | same sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $4.0M $4.0M Output — Indirect: $618k $618k Output — Induced: $764k $764k $5.4M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $1.5M $1.5M Labor income — Indirect: $190k Labor income — Induced: $279k $2.0M Value added Value added — Direct: $1.7M $1.7M Value added — Indirect: $239k V... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:048 | Labor income | $618k | medium | same sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $4.0M $4.0M Output — Indirect: $618k $618k Output — Induced: $764k $764k $5.4M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $1.5M $1.5M Labor income — Indirect: $190k Labor income — Induced: $279k $2.0M Value added Value added — Direct: $1.7M $1.7M Value added — Indirect: $239k V... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:049 | Labor income | $764k | medium | same sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $4.0M $4.0M Output — Indirect: $618k $618k Output — Induced: $764k $764k $5.4M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $1.5M $1.5M Labor income — Indirect: $190k Labor income — Induced: $279k $2.0M Value added Value added — Direct: $1.7M $1.7M Value added — Indirect: $239k V... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:050 | Labor income | $5.4M | medium | same sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $4.0M $4.0M Output — Indirect: $618k $618k Output — Induced: $764k $764k $5.4M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $1.5M $1.5M Labor income — Indirect: $190k Labor income — Induced: $279k $2.0M Value added Value added — Direct: $1.7M $1.7M Value added — Indirect: $239k V... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:051 | Labor income | $1.5M | medium | same sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $4.0M $4.0M Output — Indirect: $618k $618k Output — Induced: $764k $764k $5.4M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $1.5M $1.5M Labor income — Indirect: $190k Labor income — Induced: $279k $2.0M Value added Value added — Direct: $1.7M $1.7M Value added — Indirect: $239k V... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:052 | Labor income | $190k | medium | same sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $4.0M $4.0M Output — Indirect: $618k $618k Output — Induced: $764k $764k $5.4M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $1.5M $1.5M Labor income — Indirect: $190k Labor income — Induced: $279k $2.0M Value added Value added — Direct: $1.7M $1.7M Value added — Indirect: $239k V... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:053 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $279k | medium | same sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $4.0M $4.0M Output — Indirect: $618k $618k Output — Induced: $764k $764k $5.4M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $1.5M $1.5M Labor income — Indirect: $190k Labor income — Induced: $279k $2.0M Value added Value added — Direct: $1.7M $1.7M Value added — Indirect: $239k V... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:054 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $2.0M | medium | same sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $4.0M $4.0M Output — Indirect: $618k $618k Output — Induced: $764k $764k $5.4M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $1.5M $1.5M Labor income — Indirect: $190k Labor income — Induced: $279k $2.0M Value added Value added — Direct: $1.7M $1.7M Value added — Indirect: $239k V... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:055 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $1.7M | medium | same sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $4.0M $4.0M Output — Indirect: $618k $618k Output — Induced: $764k $764k $5.4M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $1.5M $1.5M Labor income — Indirect: $190k Labor income — Induced: $279k $2.0M Value added Value added — Direct: $1.7M $1.7M Value added — Indirect: $239k V... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:056 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $239k | medium | same sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $4.0M $4.0M Output — Indirect: $618k $618k Output — Induced: $764k $764k $5.4M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $1.5M $1.5M Labor income — Indirect: $190k Labor income — Induced: $279k $2.0M Value added Value added — Direct: $1.7M $1.7M Value added — Indirect: $239k V... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:057 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $331k | medium | same sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $4.0M $4.0M Output — Indirect: $618k $618k Output — Induced: $764k $764k $5.4M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $1.5M $1.5M Labor income — Indirect: $190k Labor income — Induced: $279k $2.0M Value added Value added — Direct: $1.7M $1.7M Value added — Indirect: $239k V... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:058 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $2.3M | medium | same sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $4.0M $4.0M Output — Indirect: $618k $618k Output — Induced: $764k $764k $5.4M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $1.5M $1.5M Labor income — Indirect: $190k Labor income — Induced: $279k $2.0M Value added Value added — Direct: $1.7M $1.7M Value added — Indirect: $239k V... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:059 | Labor income | $4.0M | medium | same sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $4.0M $618,222 $763,901 $5.4M Labor income $1.5M $189,986 $279,161 $2.0M Value added $1.7M $239,027 $331,334 $2.3M Employment 28.8 2.4 3.8 35.0 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 29 of these. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:060 | Labor income | $618,222 | medium | same sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $4.0M $618,222 $763,901 $5.4M Labor income $1.5M $189,986 $279,161 $2.0M Value added $1.7M $239,027 $331,334 $2.3M Employment 28.8 2.4 3.8 35.0 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 29 of these. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:061 | Labor income | $763,901 | medium | same sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $4.0M $618,222 $763,901 $5.4M Labor income $1.5M $189,986 $279,161 $2.0M Value added $1.7M $239,027 $331,334 $2.3M Employment 28.8 2.4 3.8 35.0 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 29 of these. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:062 | Labor income | $5.4M | medium | same sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $4.0M $618,222 $763,901 $5.4M Labor income $1.5M $189,986 $279,161 $2.0M Value added $1.7M $239,027 $331,334 $2.3M Employment 28.8 2.4 3.8 35.0 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 29 of these. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:063 | Labor income | $1.5M | medium | same sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $4.0M $618,222 $763,901 $5.4M Labor income $1.5M $189,986 $279,161 $2.0M Value added $1.7M $239,027 $331,334 $2.3M Employment 28.8 2.4 3.8 35.0 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 29 of these. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:064 | Labor income | $189,986 | medium | same sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $4.0M $618,222 $763,901 $5.4M Labor income $1.5M $189,986 $279,161 $2.0M Value added $1.7M $239,027 $331,334 $2.3M Employment 28.8 2.4 3.8 35.0 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 29 of these. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:065 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $279,161 | medium | same sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $4.0M $618,222 $763,901 $5.4M Labor income $1.5M $189,986 $279,161 $2.0M Value added $1.7M $239,027 $331,334 $2.3M Employment 28.8 2.4 3.8 35.0 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 29 of these. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:066 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $2.0M | medium | same sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $4.0M $618,222 $763,901 $5.4M Labor income $1.5M $189,986 $279,161 $2.0M Value added $1.7M $239,027 $331,334 $2.3M Employment 28.8 2.4 3.8 35.0 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 29 of these. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:067 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $1.7M | medium | same sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $4.0M $618,222 $763,901 $5.4M Labor income $1.5M $189,986 $279,161 $2.0M Value added $1.7M $239,027 $331,334 $2.3M Employment 28.8 2.4 3.8 35.0 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 29 of these. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:068 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $239,027 | medium | same sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $4.0M $618,222 $763,901 $5.4M Labor income $1.5M $189,986 $279,161 $2.0M Value added $1.7M $239,027 $331,334 $2.3M Employment 28.8 2.4 3.8 35.0 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 29 of these. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:069 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $331,334 | medium | same sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $4.0M $618,222 $763,901 $5.4M Labor income $1.5M $189,986 $279,161 $2.0M Value added $1.7M $239,027 $331,334 $2.3M Employment 28.8 2.4 3.8 35.0 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 29 of these. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:070 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $2.3M | medium | same sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $4.0M $618,222 $763,901 $5.4M Labor income $1.5M $189,986 $279,161 $2.0M Value added $1.7M $239,027 $331,334 $2.3M Employment 28.8 2.4 3.8 35.0 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 29 of these. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:071 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $5.4M | medium | same sentence | $0 $2.7M $5.4M 2026: $4.0M 2026 2027: $4.0M 2027 2028: $3.2M 2028 2029: $4.3M 2029 2030: $5.4M 2030 2031: $5.4M 2031 2032: $5.4M 2032 2033: $5.4M 2033 2034: $5.4M 2034 2035: $5.4M 2035 2036: $5.4M 2036 2037: $5.4M 2037 Regional output by year. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:072 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $4.0M | high | near table/figure reference | Year Regional output Jobs in that year Recurring or not 2026 $4.0M 13.1 not yet at the recurring level 2027 $4.0M 13.1 not yet at the recurring level 2028 $3.2M 21.0 not yet at the recurring level 2029 $4.3M 28.0 not yet at the recurring level 2030 $5.4M 35.0 at the recurring level 2031 $5.4M 35.0 at the recurring lev... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:073 | Jobs | 35.0 jobs | medium | same sentence | The recurring level is 35.0 jobs , and the 4 years before it are lower because construction and ramp-up have not yet given way to full operation; work counted in those years lasts as long as the year it sits in rather than continuing after it. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:074 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $58.8M | medium | same sentence | $58.8M Total output, undiscounted 2026–2037 $47.0M Total output, present value discounted at 4.0% 35.0 Steady-state jobs recurring, once ramped Undiscounted versus present value The undiscounted total and the present value describe the same stream of activity. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:075 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $47.0M | medium | same sentence | $58.8M Total output, undiscounted 2026–2037 $47.0M Total output, present value discounted at 4.0% 35.0 Steady-state jobs recurring, once ramped Undiscounted versus present value The undiscounted total and the present value describe the same stream of activity. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:076 | Tax and fiscal revenue | $122,000 | medium | same sentence | Fiscal impact $122,000 Local government each year at full operation $218,912 State government each year at full operation $467,611 Federal each year at full operation Why there is no tribal line No tribal rate appears in the Illustrative County tax structure, so there is no tribal line above. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:077 | Tax and fiscal revenue | $218,912 | medium | same sentence | Fiscal impact $122,000 Local government each year at full operation $218,912 State government each year at full operation $467,611 Federal each year at full operation Why there is no tribal line No tribal rate appears in the Illustrative County tax structure, so there is no tribal line above. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:078 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $208,073 | high | near table/figure reference | Revenue source Each year at full operation Sales and Excise $208,073 Property $127,529 Personal Income $226,949 Social Insurance $245,973 Total $808,523 How to read these figures Tax structure: Illustrative County (Project Red Team illustrative rates — replace with jurisdiction actuals) Tax revenue is derived from ave... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:079 | Tax and fiscal revenue | $127,529 | high | near table/figure reference | Revenue source Each year at full operation Sales and Excise $208,073 Property $127,529 Personal Income $226,949 Social Insurance $245,973 Total $808,523 How to read these figures Tax structure: Illustrative County (Project Red Team illustrative rates — replace with jurisdiction actuals) Tax revenue is derived from ave... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:080 | Tax and fiscal revenue | $226,949 | high | near table/figure reference | Revenue source Each year at full operation Sales and Excise $208,073 Property $127,529 Personal Income $226,949 Social Insurance $245,973 Total $808,523 How to read these figures Tax structure: Illustrative County (Project Red Team illustrative rates — replace with jurisdiction actuals) Tax revenue is derived from ave... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:081 | Tax and fiscal revenue | $245,973 | high | near table/figure reference | Revenue source Each year at full operation Sales and Excise $208,073 Property $127,529 Personal Income $226,949 Social Insurance $245,973 Total $808,523 How to read these figures Tax structure: Illustrative County (Project Red Team illustrative rates — replace with jurisdiction actuals) Tax revenue is derived from ave... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:082 | Tax and fiscal revenue | $808,523 | high | near table/figure reference | Revenue source Each year at full operation Sales and Excise $208,073 Property $127,529 Personal Income $226,949 Social Insurance $245,973 Total $808,523 How to read these figures Tax structure: Illustrative County (Project Red Team illustrative rates — replace with jurisdiction actuals) Tax revenue is derived from ave... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:083 | Labor income | $1M | medium | same sentence | Type II (closed on households at the accounts-implied rate) Industry Output Labor income Jobs per $1M AGR — Agriculture, forestry, and fishing 1.162 0.276 3.8 MIN — Mining and resource extraction 1.183 0.283 3.8 UTL — Utilities 1.386 0.469 4.3 CON — Construction 1.355 0.461 4.2 MFG — Manufacturing 1.766 0.524 5.2 WHL... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:084 | Jobs | 35 jobs | medium | same sentence | The modeled job mix averages 26% below the region's median wage The modeled job mix for 35 jobs averages 26% below the regional median wage ($34,250 job-weighted average wage against a $46,000 median). | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:085 | Jobs | 34,250 jobs | medium | same sentence | The modeled job mix averages 26% below the region's median wage The modeled job mix for 35 jobs averages 26% below the regional median wage ($34,250 job-weighted average wage against a $46,000 median). | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:086 | Jobs | 2.4 jobs | medium | same sentence | below 0.75x median below 0.75x median: 28.2 28.2 0.75x - 1.25x median 0.75x - 1.25x median: 4.4 4.4 above 1.25x median above 1.25x median: 2.4 2.4 Jobs supported, by what they pay relative to the region's median wage. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:087 | Labor income | $25,000 | medium | same sentence | Share of new labor income Share of regional households Under $25,000 Under $25,000 — Share of new labor income: 34.9% 35% Under $25,000 — Share of regional households: 22.0% 22% $25,000 - $50,000 $25,000 - $50,000 — Share of new labor income: 32.3% 32% $25,000 - $50,000 — Share of regional households: 27.0% 27% $50,00... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:088 | Labor income | $50,000 | medium | same sentence | Share of new labor income Share of regional households Under $25,000 Under $25,000 — Share of new labor income: 34.9% 35% Under $25,000 — Share of regional households: 22.0% 22% $25,000 - $50,000 $25,000 - $50,000 — Share of new labor income: 32.3% 32% $25,000 - $50,000 — Share of regional households: 27.0% 27% $50,00... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:089 | Labor income | $75,000 | medium | same sentence | Share of new labor income Share of regional households Under $25,000 Under $25,000 — Share of new labor income: 34.9% 35% Under $25,000 — Share of regional households: 22.0% 22% $25,000 - $50,000 $25,000 - $50,000 — Share of new labor income: 32.3% 32% $25,000 - $50,000 — Share of regional households: 27.0% 27% $50,00... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:090 | Labor income | $100,000 | medium | same sentence | Share of new labor income Share of regional households Under $25,000 Under $25,000 — Share of new labor income: 34.9% 35% Under $25,000 — Share of regional households: 22.0% 22% $25,000 - $50,000 $25,000 - $50,000 — Share of new labor income: 32.3% 32% $25,000 - $50,000 — Share of regional households: 27.0% 27% $50,00... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:091 | Jobs | 8.9 jobs | medium | same sentence | Occupation Jobs Share Average wage Food service workers 8.9 25.3% $24,500 Housekeeping and cleaning 4.0 11.3% $26,000 Recreation and fitness workers 3.5 10.0% $29,000 Front-desk and clerks 3.3 9.3% $30,500 Supervisors and managers 2.9 8.4% $47,441 Retail salespersons 2.1 6.1% $31,000 Maintenance 1.4 4.0% $38,000 Cashi... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:092 | Jobs | 3.5 jobs | medium | same sentence | Occupation Jobs Share Average wage Food service workers 8.9 25.3% $24,500 Housekeeping and cleaning 4.0 11.3% $26,000 Recreation and fitness workers 3.5 10.0% $29,000 Front-desk and clerks 3.3 9.3% $30,500 Supervisors and managers 2.9 8.4% $47,441 Retail salespersons 2.1 6.1% $31,000 Maintenance 1.4 4.0% $38,000 Cashi... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:093 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $947.5M | medium | same sentence | Key sector Buys locally Depended upon Share of output FIN — Finance, insurance, and real estate 1.04 1.01 7.5% The largest exposure is agriculture, forestry, and fishing: at most $947.5M of regional output goes with it AGR — Agriculture, forest… AGR — Agriculture, forestry, and fishing: $947.5M $947.5M RET — Retail tr... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:094 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $537.4M | medium | same sentence | Key sector Buys locally Depended upon Share of output FIN — Finance, insurance, and real estate 1.04 1.01 7.5% The largest exposure is agriculture, forestry, and fishing: at most $947.5M of regional output goes with it AGR — Agriculture, forest… AGR — Agriculture, forestry, and fishing: $947.5M $947.5M RET — Retail tr... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:095 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $213.8M | medium | same sentence | Commodity Imported Local share Regional output Scale Largest buyers MFG — Manufacturing $213.8M 8% $126.9M 1.7x AGR, MIN, RET RET — Retail trade $146.4M 32% $659.9M 0.2x AGR, MIN, HLT TRN — Transportation and warehousing $141.6M 25% $242.6M 0.6x AGR, MIN, RET WHL — Wholesale trade $133.8M 22% $187.3M 0.7x AGR, HLT, AC... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:096 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $126.9M | medium | same sentence | Commodity Imported Local share Regional output Scale Largest buyers MFG — Manufacturing $213.8M 8% $126.9M 1.7x AGR, MIN, RET RET — Retail trade $146.4M 32% $659.9M 0.2x AGR, MIN, HLT TRN — Transportation and warehousing $141.6M 25% $242.6M 0.6x AGR, MIN, RET WHL — Wholesale trade $133.8M 22% $187.3M 0.7x AGR, HLT, AC... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:097 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $8.5M | high | near table/figure reference | Commodity Study assumes Table implies Gap Spending Local demand at stake CON — Construction 62% 32% +30% $8.5M $2.6M ACC — Accommodation, food service, and recreation 100% (not stated) 38% +62% $1.6M $995,227 RET — Retail trade 100% (not stated) 32% +68% $912,000 $622,559 PRO — Professional and business services 100%... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:098 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $2.6M | high | near table/figure reference | Commodity Study assumes Table implies Gap Spending Local demand at stake CON — Construction 62% 32% +30% $8.5M $2.6M ACC — Accommodation, food service, and recreation 100% (not stated) 38% +62% $1.6M $995,227 RET — Retail trade 100% (not stated) 32% +68% $912,000 $622,559 PRO — Professional and business services 100%... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:099 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $1.9M | high | near table/figure reference | Commodity Study assumes Table implies Gap Spending Local demand at stake CON — Construction 62% 32% +30% $8.5M $2.6M ACC — Accommodation, food service, and recreation 100% (not stated) 38% +62% $1.6M $995,227 RET — Retail trade 100% (not stated) 32% +68% $912,000 $622,559 PRO — Professional and business services 100%... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:100 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $65,875 | high | near table/figure reference | Commodity Study assumes Table implies Gap Spending Local demand at stake CON — Construction 62% 32% +30% $8.5M $2.6M ACC — Accommodation, food service, and recreation 100% (not stated) 38% +62% $1.6M $995,227 RET — Retail trade 100% (not stated) 32% +68% $912,000 $622,559 PRO — Professional and business services 100%... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:101 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $2,578,995 | high | near table/figure reference | Commodity Study assumes Table implies Gap Spending Local demand at stake CON — Construction 62% 32% +30% $8.5M $2.6M ACC — Accommodation, food service, and recreation 100% (not stated) 38% +62% $1.6M $995,227 RET — Retail trade 100% (not stated) 32% +68% $912,000 $622,559 PRO — Professional and business services 100%... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:102 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $8,500,000 | high | near table/figure reference | Commodity Study assumes Table implies Gap Spending Local demand at stake CON — Construction 62% 32% +30% $8.5M $2.6M ACC — Accommodation, food service, and recreation 100% (not stated) 38% +62% $1.6M $995,227 RET — Retail trade 100% (not stated) 32% +68% $912,000 $622,559 PRO — Professional and business services 100%... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:103 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $2,578,995 | high | near table/figure reference | Construction: the study assumes 62% of this spending is met by local producers and this region's table implies 32% — 30% more local content than its structure supports, worth $2,578,995 of local final demand on $8,500,000 of spending. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:104 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $8,500,000 | high | near table/figure reference | Construction: the study assumes 62% of this spending is met by local producers and this region's table implies 32% — 30% more local content than its structure supports, worth $2,578,995 of local final demand on $8,500,000 of spending. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:105 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $1,596,000 | medium | same sentence | Accommodation, food service, and recreation: no local purchase percentage was stated, so all $1,596,000 of this spending was treated as locally produced. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:106 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $912,000 | medium | same sentence | Retail trade: no local purchase percentage was stated, so all $912,000 of this spending was treated as locally produced. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:107 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $304,000 | medium | same sentence | Professional and business services: no local purchase percentage was stated, so all $304,000 of this spending was treated as locally produced. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:108 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $342,000 | medium | same sentence | Transportation and warehousing: no local purchase percentage was stated, so all $342,000 of this spending was treated as locally produced. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:109 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $266,000 | medium | same sentence | Health, education, and social services: no local purchase percentage was stated, so all $266,000 of this spending was treated as locally produced. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:110 | Jobs | 34,250 jobs | medium | near table/figure reference | Figure Where it is stated Nearest tabulated figure $2.1M … spending the region would have seen anyway, so $2.1M of gross output was removed … $2.0M $11.2bn That report headlined an $11.2bn increase in the size of a … $1.85B $6.96bn … state's economy where its own value added was $6.96bn, a 61% overstatement produced …... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:111 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $2.1M | medium | near table/figure reference | Figure Where it is stated Nearest tabulated figure $2.1M … spending the region would have seen anyway, so $2.1M of gross output was removed … $2.0M $11.2bn That report headlined an $11.2bn increase in the size of a … $1.85B $6.96bn … state's economy where its own value added was $6.96bn, a 61% overstatement produced …... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:112 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $2.0M | medium | near table/figure reference | Figure Where it is stated Nearest tabulated figure $2.1M … spending the region would have seen anyway, so $2.1M of gross output was removed … $2.0M $11.2bn That report headlined an $11.2bn increase in the size of a … $1.85B $6.96bn … state's economy where its own value added was $6.96bn, a 61% overstatement produced …... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:113 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $11.2bn | medium | near table/figure reference | Figure Where it is stated Nearest tabulated figure $2.1M … spending the region would have seen anyway, so $2.1M of gross output was removed … $2.0M $11.2bn That report headlined an $11.2bn increase in the size of a … $1.85B $6.96bn … state's economy where its own value added was $6.96bn, a 61% overstatement produced …... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:114 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $11.2bn | medium | near table/figure reference | Figure Where it is stated Nearest tabulated figure $2.1M … spending the region would have seen anyway, so $2.1M of gross output was removed … $2.0M $11.2bn That report headlined an $11.2bn increase in the size of a … $1.85B $6.96bn … state's economy where its own value added was $6.96bn, a 61% overstatement produced …... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:115 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $1.85B | medium | near table/figure reference | Figure Where it is stated Nearest tabulated figure $2.1M … spending the region would have seen anyway, so $2.1M of gross output was removed … $2.0M $11.2bn That report headlined an $11.2bn increase in the size of a … $1.85B $6.96bn … state's economy where its own value added was $6.96bn, a 61% overstatement produced …... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:116 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $6.96bn | medium | near table/figure reference | Figure Where it is stated Nearest tabulated figure $2.1M … spending the region would have seen anyway, so $2.1M of gross output was removed … $2.0M $11.2bn That report headlined an $11.2bn increase in the size of a … $1.85B $6.96bn … state's economy where its own value added was $6.96bn, a 61% overstatement produced …... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:117 | Value added, comparable to local GDP | $477,274 | medium | near table/figure reference | Figure Where it is stated Nearest tabulated figure $2.1M … spending the region would have seen anyway, so $2.1M of gross output was removed … $2.0M $11.2bn That report headlined an $11.2bn increase in the size of a … $1.85B $6.96bn … state's economy where its own value added was $6.96bn, a 61% overstatement produced …... | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:118 | Jobs | 20,000 jobs | medium | same sentence | regional employment: 20,000 jobs across 12 sectors from BLS QCEW; suppression: two suppressed cells filled from the state ratio for the same sector 3. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:119 | Labor income | $1 | medium | same sentence | induced effects illustrative household closure at the accounts-implied consumption rate Lbar = (I - Abar)^-1 with a household row and column Local consumption per $1 of local labor income = $0.333, taken from the household column of the regional accounts rather than assumed. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:120 | Labor income | $0.333 | medium | same sentence | induced effects illustrative household closure at the accounts-implied consumption rate Lbar = (I - Abar)^-1 with a household row and column Local consumption per $1 of local labor income = $0.333, taken from the household column of the regional accounts rather than assumed. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:121 | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth | $1 | low | same sentence | employment event: Facility staff estimated job count converted to industry output output = jobs / (jobs per $1 of output) The 22 stated jobs have the same output per worker as the regional average for ACC. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
| claim:122 | Jobs | 1.25 jobs | medium | same sentence | 1.25 workers and 2.4 people per household. | the submitted file's own wording, character for character |
Quote safety. The submitted file was read as text, so this is that file's own wording, character for character. It may be quoted as what the file we were given says. What that is not is a statement that the file we were given is the published document; the name and SHA-256 of what was read are recorded in the source section.
Counted by detector: 76% recall on held-out studies, about 4 in 10 flags not what was sought, and per-document recall observed across 67% to 87% with overlapping intervals. Full limits are stated above.
Gate Findings, Every Gate Run
| Gate | Status | Subject | Reason | Consequence | Related |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| contribution_vs_impact_gate | pass | Whether the headline is new activity or activity that already exists | Detected study type is mixed. | Claim type is at least machine-labelable from the text. | — |
| fiscal_truth_gate | fail | Whether the tax figure is a net gain to the public purse | Fiscal revenue is detected, but no cost-side or net-fiscal treatment was detected. | Do not release fiscal benefit language as net benefit. | missing_public_cost_side |
| visitor_spending_gate | pass | Whether the visitor money is new to the area or already circulating in it | Visitor/local or new-money language was detected. | The split is addressed; a reviewer should still check the arithmetic. | — |
| survey_adequacy_gate | warn | Whether the survey behind the spending figure carries the weight put on it | Survey coverage appears weak: 7 of 39 responses were detected. | Carry the response weakness beside every survey-derived result. | weak_survey_coverage |
| model_vintage_gate | fail | Whether the study says which year's model and which year's dollars it used | RIMS II is named, but no model or data year was detected. | Do not release year-sensitive claims without vintage disclosure. | missing_model_year |
| geography_fit_gate | pass | Whether the area modeled is the area the board is deciding for | Detected study geography: national. | A geography is present for reviewer checks. | — |
| tax_gross_vs_net_gate | fail | Whether the tax figure is gross collections or money this jurisdiction keeps | Tax claims are detected, but gross-vs-net treatment was not detected. | Tax claims should not be used as fiscal benefit until retention is shown. | missing_tax_retention_or_netting |
| benefit_cost_gate | pass | Whether the return ratio has a defined cost side | Benefit-cost language includes cost, discount, and counterfactual cues. | The ratio is reviewable from the text cues. | — |
| source_confidence_gate | pass | How much of the submitted document the audit could read and match | Claims and source/method cues were detected. | Weigh every finding here against how much of the written standard could be checked mechanically on this document: 23 checks: 3 measured, 0 not matched, 20 need a reader. | — |
Counted by detector: 76% recall on held-out studies, about 4 in 10 flags not what was sought, and per-document recall observed across 67% to 87% with overlapping intervals. Full limits are stated above.
Every Expected-Evidence Item, As The Audit Object Records It
| ID | Weight | Expected | Why the audit says so | Consequence | Gate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| missing_public_cost_side | blocking | Public service costs, abatements, incentives, or other cost-side fiscal evidence | Tax or fiscal revenue appears without a detected public cost-side ledger. | Gross tax revenue may be mistaken for net fiscal benefit. | fiscal_truth_gate |
| missing_model_year | blocking | Model year or data year | RIMS II is named, but no model/data year was detected. | Model structure may not match the spending period. | model_vintage_gate |
| missing_tax_retention_or_netting | blocking | Gross-vs-net tax treatment and retention/abatement assumptions | Tax revenue appears without gross/net or tax-retention language. | A gross tax collection can be mistaken for fiscal benefit to the decision maker. | tax_gross_vs_net_gate |
Counted by detector: 76% recall on held-out studies, about 4 in 10 flags not what was sought, and per-document recall observed across 67% to 87% with overlapping intervals. Full limits are stated above.
Evidence Surface, Every Observation
Contract: evidence_surface.v1; audit contract: implan_audit_mode.v0.
| Observation | Kind | Recorded as not matched | Direction | Claim | Consequence | Authority | Provenance | Vintage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| source:status | Data quality penalty | no | neutral | Source extraction status: audit-safe. | Sets the floor for what the audit may claim from this document; a weak source cannot support a strong release finding. | Project Red Team source intake | prt-synth-study.html | — |
| base:model_name | Base model input | no | neutral | Model named by the study: RIMS II. | Sets the audit context that gates use before any headline claim can travel. | IMPLAN Audit Mode study-profile extractor | prt-synth-study.html | 2024 |
| base:dollar_year | Base model input | no | neutral | Dollar or currency year named by the study: 2024. | Sets the audit context that gates use before any headline claim can travel. | IMPLAN Audit Mode study-profile extractor | prt-synth-study.html | 2024 |
| base:geography | Base model input | no | neutral | Study geography named by the study: national. | Sets the audit context that gates use before any headline claim can travel. | IMPLAN Audit Mode study-profile extractor | prt-synth-study.html | 2024 |
| claim:001 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $4.0M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Regional Sports and Events Complex — Economic Impact (free-data path) Whether a $4.0M county contribution is recovered through the revenue the facility generates. | 2024 |
| claim:002 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Jobs claim: 35 jobs. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Where the wages land, by band and by household — which is not a share of anyone's profit and not a distribution to anyone's members Residents of the host community, and whoever speaks for them Examined — 35 jobs placed across 5 income bands, averaging 74% of the regional median wage. | 2024 |
| claim:003 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $5.4M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Summary of findings $5.4M Annual Operations — annual output every year at full operation 35.0 Annual Operations — jobs supported recurring while operating; direct, indirect and induced $8.0M Construction — one-time output total over the build period 26.1 Construction — job-years temporary, not permanent positions $340... | 2024 |
| claim:004 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $8.0M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Summary of findings $5.4M Annual Operations — annual output every year at full operation 35.0 Annual Operations — jobs supported recurring while operating; direct, indirect and induced $8.0M Construction — one-time output total over the build period 26.1 Construction — job-years temporary, not permanent positions $340... | 2024 |
| claim:005 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $340,912. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Summary of findings $5.4M Annual Operations — annual output every year at full operation 35.0 Annual Operations — jobs supported recurring while operating; direct, indirect and induced $8.0M Construction — one-time output total over the build period 26.1 Construction — job-years temporary, not permanent positions $340... | 2024 |
| claim:006 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $2.1M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted near a table or figure reference | 28% of its demand is spending the region would have seen anyway, so $2.1M of gross output was removed before any figure above was computed, and $5.4M is what remains. | 2024 |
| claim:007 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $5.4M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted near a table or figure reference | 28% of its demand is spending the region would have seen anyway, so $2.1M of gross output was removed before any figure above was computed, and $5.4M is what remains. | 2024 |
| claim:008 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $58.8M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Over the 2026–2037 horizon the project generates $58.8M in total regional output undiscounted, or $47.0M in present value at 4.0%. | 2024 |
| claim:009 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $47.0M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Over the 2026–2037 horizon the project generates $58.8M in total regional output undiscounted, or $47.0M in present value at 4.0%. | 2024 |
| claim:010 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Jobs claim: 35.0 jobs. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted near a table or figure reference | Once construction ends and operations reach full capacity, the recurring level is 35.0 jobs — the figure a community experiences year after year, and the one that should anchor any long-run expectation. | 2024 |
| claim:011 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Jobs claim: 35 jobs. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted near a table or figure reference | Figure Size Against How big that is What it says Annual Operations: jobs supported, per year 35 jobs all jobs in Illustrative County 20,000 jobs The project accounts for 0.17% of all jobs in Illustrative County. | 2024 |
| claim:012 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Jobs claim: 20,000 jobs. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted near a table or figure reference | Figure Size Against How big that is What it says Annual Operations: jobs supported, per year 35 jobs all jobs in Illustrative County 20,000 jobs The project accounts for 0.17% of all jobs in Illustrative County. | 2024 |
| claim:013 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $2.3M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Annual Operations: value added, per year $2.3M the whole economy of Illustrative County (value added, which is what a county's GDP measures) $1.85B The project accounts for 0.13% of everything Illustrative County produces in a year. | 2024 |
| claim:014 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $1.85B. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Annual Operations: value added, per year $2.3M the whole economy of Illustrative County (value added, which is what a county's GDP measures) $1.85B The project accounts for 0.13% of everything Illustrative County produces in a year. | 2024 |
| claim:015 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Jobs claim: 241 jobs. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | The project is smaller than every industry in this region: the smallest, Manufacturing, supports 241 jobs against the project’s 35. | 2024 |
| claim:016 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $5.4M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Annual Operations: output, $5.4M What is withheld. | 2024 |
| claim:017 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $11.2bn. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted near a table or figure reference | That report headlined an $11.2bn increase in the size of a state's economy where its own value added was $6.96bn, a 61% overstatement produced by swapping one word, in a table whose gloss on the output row read that GDP is a measure of the overall size of the economy. | 2024 |
| claim:018 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $6.96bn. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted near a table or figure reference | That report headlined an $11.2bn increase in the size of a state's economy where its own value added was $6.96bn, a 61% overstatement produced by swapping one word, in a table whose gloss on the output row read that GDP is a measure of the overall size of the economy. | 2024 |
| claim:019 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $2.3M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted near a table or figure reference | Value added is the comparable figure, and it is anchored above at $2.3M. | 2024 |
| claim:020 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Jobs claim: 26 job-years. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Construction: 26 job-years What is withheld. | 2024 |
| claim:021 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $0.333. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | The ratio itself is on the record: $0.333 of local consumption per $1.00 of local labor income, taken from the household column of the regional accounts rather than assumed. | 2024 |
| claim:022 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $1.00. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | The ratio itself is on the record: $0.333 of local consumption per $1.00 of local labor income, taken from the household column of the regional accounts rather than assumed. | 2024 |
| claim:023 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $5.9M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $5.9M $5.9M Output — Indirect: $1.0M $1.0M Output — Induced: $1.1M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $2.0M $2.0M Labor income — Indirect: $330k Labor income — Induced: $384k $2.7M Value added Value added — Direct: $2.3M $2.3M Value added — Indirect: $410k V... | 2024 |
| claim:024 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $1.0M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $5.9M $5.9M Output — Indirect: $1.0M $1.0M Output — Induced: $1.1M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $2.0M $2.0M Labor income — Indirect: $330k Labor income — Induced: $384k $2.7M Value added Value added — Direct: $2.3M $2.3M Value added — Indirect: $410k V... | 2024 |
| claim:025 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $1.1M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $5.9M $5.9M Output — Indirect: $1.0M $1.0M Output — Induced: $1.1M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $2.0M $2.0M Labor income — Indirect: $330k Labor income — Induced: $384k $2.7M Value added Value added — Direct: $2.3M $2.3M Value added — Indirect: $410k V... | 2024 |
| claim:026 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $8.0M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $5.9M $5.9M Output — Indirect: $1.0M $1.0M Output — Induced: $1.1M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $2.0M $2.0M Labor income — Indirect: $330k Labor income — Induced: $384k $2.7M Value added Value added — Direct: $2.3M $2.3M Value added — Indirect: $410k V... | 2024 |
| claim:027 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $2.0M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $5.9M $5.9M Output — Indirect: $1.0M $1.0M Output — Induced: $1.1M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $2.0M $2.0M Labor income — Indirect: $330k Labor income — Induced: $384k $2.7M Value added Value added — Direct: $2.3M $2.3M Value added — Indirect: $410k V... | 2024 |
| claim:028 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $330k. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $5.9M $5.9M Output — Indirect: $1.0M $1.0M Output — Induced: $1.1M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $2.0M $2.0M Labor income — Indirect: $330k Labor income — Induced: $384k $2.7M Value added Value added — Direct: $2.3M $2.3M Value added — Indirect: $410k V... | 2024 |
| claim:029 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $384k. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $5.9M $5.9M Output — Indirect: $1.0M $1.0M Output — Induced: $1.1M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $2.0M $2.0M Labor income — Indirect: $330k Labor income — Induced: $384k $2.7M Value added Value added — Direct: $2.3M $2.3M Value added — Indirect: $410k V... | 2024 |
| claim:030 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $2.7M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $5.9M $5.9M Output — Indirect: $1.0M $1.0M Output — Induced: $1.1M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $2.0M $2.0M Labor income — Indirect: $330k Labor income — Induced: $384k $2.7M Value added Value added — Direct: $2.3M $2.3M Value added — Indirect: $410k V... | 2024 |
| claim:031 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $2.3M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $5.9M $5.9M Output — Indirect: $1.0M $1.0M Output — Induced: $1.1M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $2.0M $2.0M Labor income — Indirect: $330k Labor income — Induced: $384k $2.7M Value added Value added — Direct: $2.3M $2.3M Value added — Indirect: $410k V... | 2024 |
| claim:032 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $410k. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $5.9M $5.9M Output — Indirect: $1.0M $1.0M Output — Induced: $1.1M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $2.0M $2.0M Labor income — Indirect: $330k Labor income — Induced: $384k $2.7M Value added Value added — Direct: $2.3M $2.3M Value added — Indirect: $410k V... | 2024 |
| claim:033 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $456k. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $5.9M $5.9M Output — Indirect: $1.0M $1.0M Output — Induced: $1.1M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $2.0M $2.0M Labor income — Indirect: $330k Labor income — Induced: $384k $2.7M Value added Value added — Direct: $2.3M $2.3M Value added — Indirect: $410k V... | 2024 |
| claim:034 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $3.2M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $5.9M $5.9M Output — Indirect: $1.0M $1.0M Output — Induced: $1.1M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $2.0M $2.0M Labor income — Indirect: $330k Labor income — Induced: $384k $2.7M Value added Value added — Direct: $2.3M $2.3M Value added — Indirect: $410k V... | 2024 |
| claim:035 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $5.9M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $5.9M $1.0M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income $2.0M $329,963 $384,143 $2.7M Value added $2.3M $409,987 $455,935 $3.2M Employment 16.8 4.1 5.2 26.1 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 17 of these. | 2024 |
| claim:036 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $1.0M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $5.9M $1.0M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income $2.0M $329,963 $384,143 $2.7M Value added $2.3M $409,987 $455,935 $3.2M Employment 16.8 4.1 5.2 26.1 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 17 of these. | 2024 |
| claim:037 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $1.1M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $5.9M $1.0M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income $2.0M $329,963 $384,143 $2.7M Value added $2.3M $409,987 $455,935 $3.2M Employment 16.8 4.1 5.2 26.1 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 17 of these. | 2024 |
| claim:038 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $8.0M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $5.9M $1.0M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income $2.0M $329,963 $384,143 $2.7M Value added $2.3M $409,987 $455,935 $3.2M Employment 16.8 4.1 5.2 26.1 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 17 of these. | 2024 |
| claim:039 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $2.0M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $5.9M $1.0M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income $2.0M $329,963 $384,143 $2.7M Value added $2.3M $409,987 $455,935 $3.2M Employment 16.8 4.1 5.2 26.1 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 17 of these. | 2024 |
| claim:040 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $329,963. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $5.9M $1.0M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income $2.0M $329,963 $384,143 $2.7M Value added $2.3M $409,987 $455,935 $3.2M Employment 16.8 4.1 5.2 26.1 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 17 of these. | 2024 |
| claim:041 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $384,143. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $5.9M $1.0M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income $2.0M $329,963 $384,143 $2.7M Value added $2.3M $409,987 $455,935 $3.2M Employment 16.8 4.1 5.2 26.1 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 17 of these. | 2024 |
| claim:042 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $2.7M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $5.9M $1.0M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income $2.0M $329,963 $384,143 $2.7M Value added $2.3M $409,987 $455,935 $3.2M Employment 16.8 4.1 5.2 26.1 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 17 of these. | 2024 |
| claim:043 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $2.3M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $5.9M $1.0M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income $2.0M $329,963 $384,143 $2.7M Value added $2.3M $409,987 $455,935 $3.2M Employment 16.8 4.1 5.2 26.1 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 17 of these. | 2024 |
| claim:044 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $409,987. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $5.9M $1.0M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income $2.0M $329,963 $384,143 $2.7M Value added $2.3M $409,987 $455,935 $3.2M Employment 16.8 4.1 5.2 26.1 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 17 of these. | 2024 |
| claim:045 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $455,935. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $5.9M $1.0M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income $2.0M $329,963 $384,143 $2.7M Value added $2.3M $409,987 $455,935 $3.2M Employment 16.8 4.1 5.2 26.1 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 17 of these. | 2024 |
| claim:046 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $3.2M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $5.9M $1.0M $1.1M $8.0M Labor income $2.0M $329,963 $384,143 $2.7M Value added $2.3M $409,987 $455,935 $3.2M Employment 16.8 4.1 5.2 26.1 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 17 of these. | 2024 |
| claim:047 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $4.0M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $4.0M $4.0M Output — Indirect: $618k $618k Output — Induced: $764k $764k $5.4M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $1.5M $1.5M Labor income — Indirect: $190k Labor income — Induced: $279k $2.0M Value added Value added — Direct: $1.7M $1.7M Value added — Indirect: $239k V... | 2024 |
| claim:048 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $618k. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $4.0M $4.0M Output — Indirect: $618k $618k Output — Induced: $764k $764k $5.4M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $1.5M $1.5M Labor income — Indirect: $190k Labor income — Induced: $279k $2.0M Value added Value added — Direct: $1.7M $1.7M Value added — Indirect: $239k V... | 2024 |
| claim:049 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $764k. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $4.0M $4.0M Output — Indirect: $618k $618k Output — Induced: $764k $764k $5.4M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $1.5M $1.5M Labor income — Indirect: $190k Labor income — Induced: $279k $2.0M Value added Value added — Direct: $1.7M $1.7M Value added — Indirect: $239k V... | 2024 |
| claim:050 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $5.4M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $4.0M $4.0M Output — Indirect: $618k $618k Output — Induced: $764k $764k $5.4M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $1.5M $1.5M Labor income — Indirect: $190k Labor income — Induced: $279k $2.0M Value added Value added — Direct: $1.7M $1.7M Value added — Indirect: $239k V... | 2024 |
| claim:051 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $1.5M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $4.0M $4.0M Output — Indirect: $618k $618k Output — Induced: $764k $764k $5.4M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $1.5M $1.5M Labor income — Indirect: $190k Labor income — Induced: $279k $2.0M Value added Value added — Direct: $1.7M $1.7M Value added — Indirect: $239k V... | 2024 |
| claim:052 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $190k. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $4.0M $4.0M Output — Indirect: $618k $618k Output — Induced: $764k $764k $5.4M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $1.5M $1.5M Labor income — Indirect: $190k Labor income — Induced: $279k $2.0M Value added Value added — Direct: $1.7M $1.7M Value added — Indirect: $239k V... | 2024 |
| claim:053 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $279k. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $4.0M $4.0M Output — Indirect: $618k $618k Output — Induced: $764k $764k $5.4M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $1.5M $1.5M Labor income — Indirect: $190k Labor income — Induced: $279k $2.0M Value added Value added — Direct: $1.7M $1.7M Value added — Indirect: $239k V... | 2024 |
| claim:054 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $2.0M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $4.0M $4.0M Output — Indirect: $618k $618k Output — Induced: $764k $764k $5.4M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $1.5M $1.5M Labor income — Indirect: $190k Labor income — Induced: $279k $2.0M Value added Value added — Direct: $1.7M $1.7M Value added — Indirect: $239k V... | 2024 |
| claim:055 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $1.7M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $4.0M $4.0M Output — Indirect: $618k $618k Output — Induced: $764k $764k $5.4M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $1.5M $1.5M Labor income — Indirect: $190k Labor income — Induced: $279k $2.0M Value added Value added — Direct: $1.7M $1.7M Value added — Indirect: $239k V... | 2024 |
| claim:056 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $239k. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $4.0M $4.0M Output — Indirect: $618k $618k Output — Induced: $764k $764k $5.4M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $1.5M $1.5M Labor income — Indirect: $190k Labor income — Induced: $279k $2.0M Value added Value added — Direct: $1.7M $1.7M Value added — Indirect: $239k V... | 2024 |
| claim:057 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $331k. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $4.0M $4.0M Output — Indirect: $618k $618k Output — Induced: $764k $764k $5.4M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $1.5M $1.5M Labor income — Indirect: $190k Labor income — Induced: $279k $2.0M Value added Value added — Direct: $1.7M $1.7M Value added — Indirect: $239k V... | 2024 |
| claim:058 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $2.3M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Direct Indirect Induced Output Output — Direct: $4.0M $4.0M Output — Indirect: $618k $618k Output — Induced: $764k $764k $5.4M Labor income Labor income — Direct: $1.5M $1.5M Labor income — Indirect: $190k Labor income — Induced: $279k $2.0M Value added Value added — Direct: $1.7M $1.7M Value added — Indirect: $239k V... | 2024 |
| claim:059 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $4.0M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $4.0M $618,222 $763,901 $5.4M Labor income $1.5M $189,986 $279,161 $2.0M Value added $1.7M $239,027 $331,334 $2.3M Employment 28.8 2.4 3.8 35.0 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 29 of these. | 2024 |
| claim:060 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $618,222. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $4.0M $618,222 $763,901 $5.4M Labor income $1.5M $189,986 $279,161 $2.0M Value added $1.7M $239,027 $331,334 $2.3M Employment 28.8 2.4 3.8 35.0 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 29 of these. | 2024 |
| claim:061 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $763,901. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $4.0M $618,222 $763,901 $5.4M Labor income $1.5M $189,986 $279,161 $2.0M Value added $1.7M $239,027 $331,334 $2.3M Employment 28.8 2.4 3.8 35.0 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 29 of these. | 2024 |
| claim:062 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $5.4M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $4.0M $618,222 $763,901 $5.4M Labor income $1.5M $189,986 $279,161 $2.0M Value added $1.7M $239,027 $331,334 $2.3M Employment 28.8 2.4 3.8 35.0 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 29 of these. | 2024 |
| claim:063 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $1.5M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $4.0M $618,222 $763,901 $5.4M Labor income $1.5M $189,986 $279,161 $2.0M Value added $1.7M $239,027 $331,334 $2.3M Employment 28.8 2.4 3.8 35.0 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 29 of these. | 2024 |
| claim:064 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $189,986. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $4.0M $618,222 $763,901 $5.4M Labor income $1.5M $189,986 $279,161 $2.0M Value added $1.7M $239,027 $331,334 $2.3M Employment 28.8 2.4 3.8 35.0 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 29 of these. | 2024 |
| claim:065 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $279,161. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $4.0M $618,222 $763,901 $5.4M Labor income $1.5M $189,986 $279,161 $2.0M Value added $1.7M $239,027 $331,334 $2.3M Employment 28.8 2.4 3.8 35.0 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 29 of these. | 2024 |
| claim:066 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $2.0M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $4.0M $618,222 $763,901 $5.4M Labor income $1.5M $189,986 $279,161 $2.0M Value added $1.7M $239,027 $331,334 $2.3M Employment 28.8 2.4 3.8 35.0 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 29 of these. | 2024 |
| claim:067 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $1.7M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $4.0M $618,222 $763,901 $5.4M Labor income $1.5M $189,986 $279,161 $2.0M Value added $1.7M $239,027 $331,334 $2.3M Employment 28.8 2.4 3.8 35.0 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 29 of these. | 2024 |
| claim:068 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $239,027. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $4.0M $618,222 $763,901 $5.4M Labor income $1.5M $189,986 $279,161 $2.0M Value added $1.7M $239,027 $331,334 $2.3M Employment 28.8 2.4 3.8 35.0 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 29 of these. | 2024 |
| claim:069 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $331,334. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $4.0M $618,222 $763,901 $5.4M Labor income $1.5M $189,986 $279,161 $2.0M Value added $1.7M $239,027 $331,334 $2.3M Employment 28.8 2.4 3.8 35.0 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 29 of these. | 2024 |
| claim:070 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $2.3M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output $4.0M $618,222 $763,901 $5.4M Labor income $1.5M $189,986 $279,161 $2.0M Value added $1.7M $239,027 $331,334 $2.3M Employment 28.8 2.4 3.8 35.0 The arithmetic, in words: the project itself accounts for 29 of these. | 2024 |
| claim:071 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $5.4M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | $0 $2.7M $5.4M 2026: $4.0M 2026 2027: $4.0M 2027 2028: $3.2M 2028 2029: $4.3M 2029 2030: $5.4M 2030 2031: $5.4M 2031 2032: $5.4M 2032 2033: $5.4M 2033 2034: $5.4M 2034 2035: $5.4M 2035 2036: $5.4M 2036 2037: $5.4M 2037 Regional output by year. | 2024 |
| claim:072 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $4.0M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted near a table or figure reference | Year Regional output Jobs in that year Recurring or not 2026 $4.0M 13.1 not yet at the recurring level 2027 $4.0M 13.1 not yet at the recurring level 2028 $3.2M 21.0 not yet at the recurring level 2029 $4.3M 28.0 not yet at the recurring level 2030 $5.4M 35.0 at the recurring level 2031 $5.4M 35.0 at the recurring lev... | 2024 |
| claim:073 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Jobs claim: 35.0 jobs. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | The recurring level is 35.0 jobs , and the 4 years before it are lower because construction and ramp-up have not yet given way to full operation; work counted in those years lasts as long as the year it sits in rather than continuing after it. | 2024 |
| claim:074 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $58.8M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | $58.8M Total output, undiscounted 2026–2037 $47.0M Total output, present value discounted at 4.0% 35.0 Steady-state jobs recurring, once ramped Undiscounted versus present value The undiscounted total and the present value describe the same stream of activity. | 2024 |
| claim:075 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $47.0M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | $58.8M Total output, undiscounted 2026–2037 $47.0M Total output, present value discounted at 4.0% 35.0 Steady-state jobs recurring, once ramped Undiscounted versus present value The undiscounted total and the present value describe the same stream of activity. | 2024 |
| claim:076 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Tax and fiscal revenue claim: $122,000. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Fiscal impact $122,000 Local government each year at full operation $218,912 State government each year at full operation $467,611 Federal each year at full operation Why there is no tribal line No tribal rate appears in the Illustrative County tax structure, so there is no tribal line above. | 2024 |
| claim:077 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Tax and fiscal revenue claim: $218,912. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Fiscal impact $122,000 Local government each year at full operation $218,912 State government each year at full operation $467,611 Federal each year at full operation Why there is no tribal line No tribal rate appears in the Illustrative County tax structure, so there is no tribal line above. | 2024 |
| claim:078 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $208,073. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted near a table or figure reference | Revenue source Each year at full operation Sales and Excise $208,073 Property $127,529 Personal Income $226,949 Social Insurance $245,973 Total $808,523 How to read these figures Tax structure: Illustrative County (Project Red Team illustrative rates — replace with jurisdiction actuals) Tax revenue is derived from ave... | 2024 |
| claim:079 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Tax and fiscal revenue claim: $127,529. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted near a table or figure reference | Revenue source Each year at full operation Sales and Excise $208,073 Property $127,529 Personal Income $226,949 Social Insurance $245,973 Total $808,523 How to read these figures Tax structure: Illustrative County (Project Red Team illustrative rates — replace with jurisdiction actuals) Tax revenue is derived from ave... | 2024 |
| claim:080 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Tax and fiscal revenue claim: $226,949. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted near a table or figure reference | Revenue source Each year at full operation Sales and Excise $208,073 Property $127,529 Personal Income $226,949 Social Insurance $245,973 Total $808,523 How to read these figures Tax structure: Illustrative County (Project Red Team illustrative rates — replace with jurisdiction actuals) Tax revenue is derived from ave... | 2024 |
| claim:081 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Tax and fiscal revenue claim: $245,973. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted near a table or figure reference | Revenue source Each year at full operation Sales and Excise $208,073 Property $127,529 Personal Income $226,949 Social Insurance $245,973 Total $808,523 How to read these figures Tax structure: Illustrative County (Project Red Team illustrative rates — replace with jurisdiction actuals) Tax revenue is derived from ave... | 2024 |
| claim:082 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Tax and fiscal revenue claim: $808,523. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted near a table or figure reference | Revenue source Each year at full operation Sales and Excise $208,073 Property $127,529 Personal Income $226,949 Social Insurance $245,973 Total $808,523 How to read these figures Tax structure: Illustrative County (Project Red Team illustrative rates — replace with jurisdiction actuals) Tax revenue is derived from ave... | 2024 |
| claim:083 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $1M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Type II (closed on households at the accounts-implied rate) Industry Output Labor income Jobs per $1M AGR — Agriculture, forestry, and fishing 1.162 0.276 3.8 MIN — Mining and resource extraction 1.183 0.283 3.8 UTL — Utilities 1.386 0.469 4.3 CON — Construction 1.355 0.461 4.2 MFG — Manufacturing 1.766 0.524 5.2 WHL... | 2024 |
| claim:084 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Jobs claim: 35 jobs. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | The modeled job mix averages 26% below the region's median wage The modeled job mix for 35 jobs averages 26% below the regional median wage ($34,250 job-weighted average wage against a $46,000 median). | 2024 |
| claim:085 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Jobs claim: 34,250 jobs. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | The modeled job mix averages 26% below the region's median wage The modeled job mix for 35 jobs averages 26% below the regional median wage ($34,250 job-weighted average wage against a $46,000 median). | 2024 |
| claim:086 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Jobs claim: 2.4 jobs. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | below 0.75x median below 0.75x median: 28.2 28.2 0.75x - 1.25x median 0.75x - 1.25x median: 4.4 4.4 above 1.25x median above 1.25x median: 2.4 2.4 Jobs supported, by what they pay relative to the region's median wage. | 2024 |
| claim:087 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $25,000. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Share of new labor income Share of regional households Under $25,000 Under $25,000 — Share of new labor income: 34.9% 35% Under $25,000 — Share of regional households: 22.0% 22% $25,000 - $50,000 $25,000 - $50,000 — Share of new labor income: 32.3% 32% $25,000 - $50,000 — Share of regional households: 27.0% 27% $50,00... | 2024 |
| claim:088 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $50,000. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Share of new labor income Share of regional households Under $25,000 Under $25,000 — Share of new labor income: 34.9% 35% Under $25,000 — Share of regional households: 22.0% 22% $25,000 - $50,000 $25,000 - $50,000 — Share of new labor income: 32.3% 32% $25,000 - $50,000 — Share of regional households: 27.0% 27% $50,00... | 2024 |
| claim:089 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $75,000. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Share of new labor income Share of regional households Under $25,000 Under $25,000 — Share of new labor income: 34.9% 35% Under $25,000 — Share of regional households: 22.0% 22% $25,000 - $50,000 $25,000 - $50,000 — Share of new labor income: 32.3% 32% $25,000 - $50,000 — Share of regional households: 27.0% 27% $50,00... | 2024 |
| claim:090 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $100,000. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Share of new labor income Share of regional households Under $25,000 Under $25,000 — Share of new labor income: 34.9% 35% Under $25,000 — Share of regional households: 22.0% 22% $25,000 - $50,000 $25,000 - $50,000 — Share of new labor income: 32.3% 32% $25,000 - $50,000 — Share of regional households: 27.0% 27% $50,00... | 2024 |
| claim:091 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Jobs claim: 8.9 jobs. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Occupation Jobs Share Average wage Food service workers 8.9 25.3% $24,500 Housekeeping and cleaning 4.0 11.3% $26,000 Recreation and fitness workers 3.5 10.0% $29,000 Front-desk and clerks 3.3 9.3% $30,500 Supervisors and managers 2.9 8.4% $47,441 Retail salespersons 2.1 6.1% $31,000 Maintenance 1.4 4.0% $38,000 Cashi... | 2024 |
| claim:092 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Jobs claim: 3.5 jobs. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Occupation Jobs Share Average wage Food service workers 8.9 25.3% $24,500 Housekeeping and cleaning 4.0 11.3% $26,000 Recreation and fitness workers 3.5 10.0% $29,000 Front-desk and clerks 3.3 9.3% $30,500 Supervisors and managers 2.9 8.4% $47,441 Retail salespersons 2.1 6.1% $31,000 Maintenance 1.4 4.0% $38,000 Cashi... | 2024 |
| claim:093 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $947.5M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Key sector Buys locally Depended upon Share of output FIN — Finance, insurance, and real estate 1.04 1.01 7.5% The largest exposure is agriculture, forestry, and fishing: at most $947.5M of regional output goes with it AGR — Agriculture, forest… AGR — Agriculture, forestry, and fishing: $947.5M $947.5M RET — Retail tr... | 2024 |
| claim:094 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $537.4M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Key sector Buys locally Depended upon Share of output FIN — Finance, insurance, and real estate 1.04 1.01 7.5% The largest exposure is agriculture, forestry, and fishing: at most $947.5M of regional output goes with it AGR — Agriculture, forest… AGR — Agriculture, forestry, and fishing: $947.5M $947.5M RET — Retail tr... | 2024 |
| claim:095 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $213.8M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Commodity Imported Local share Regional output Scale Largest buyers MFG — Manufacturing $213.8M 8% $126.9M 1.7x AGR, MIN, RET RET — Retail trade $146.4M 32% $659.9M 0.2x AGR, MIN, HLT TRN — Transportation and warehousing $141.6M 25% $242.6M 0.6x AGR, MIN, RET WHL — Wholesale trade $133.8M 22% $187.3M 0.7x AGR, HLT, AC... | 2024 |
| claim:096 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $126.9M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Commodity Imported Local share Regional output Scale Largest buyers MFG — Manufacturing $213.8M 8% $126.9M 1.7x AGR, MIN, RET RET — Retail trade $146.4M 32% $659.9M 0.2x AGR, MIN, HLT TRN — Transportation and warehousing $141.6M 25% $242.6M 0.6x AGR, MIN, RET WHL — Wholesale trade $133.8M 22% $187.3M 0.7x AGR, HLT, AC... | 2024 |
| claim:097 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $8.5M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted near a table or figure reference | Commodity Study assumes Table implies Gap Spending Local demand at stake CON — Construction 62% 32% +30% $8.5M $2.6M ACC — Accommodation, food service, and recreation 100% (not stated) 38% +62% $1.6M $995,227 RET — Retail trade 100% (not stated) 32% +68% $912,000 $622,559 PRO — Professional and business services 100%... | 2024 |
| claim:098 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $2.6M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted near a table or figure reference | Commodity Study assumes Table implies Gap Spending Local demand at stake CON — Construction 62% 32% +30% $8.5M $2.6M ACC — Accommodation, food service, and recreation 100% (not stated) 38% +62% $1.6M $995,227 RET — Retail trade 100% (not stated) 32% +68% $912,000 $622,559 PRO — Professional and business services 100%... | 2024 |
| claim:099 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $1.9M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted near a table or figure reference | Commodity Study assumes Table implies Gap Spending Local demand at stake CON — Construction 62% 32% +30% $8.5M $2.6M ACC — Accommodation, food service, and recreation 100% (not stated) 38% +62% $1.6M $995,227 RET — Retail trade 100% (not stated) 32% +68% $912,000 $622,559 PRO — Professional and business services 100%... | 2024 |
| claim:100 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $65,875. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted near a table or figure reference | Commodity Study assumes Table implies Gap Spending Local demand at stake CON — Construction 62% 32% +30% $8.5M $2.6M ACC — Accommodation, food service, and recreation 100% (not stated) 38% +62% $1.6M $995,227 RET — Retail trade 100% (not stated) 32% +68% $912,000 $622,559 PRO — Professional and business services 100%... | 2024 |
| claim:101 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $2,578,995. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted near a table or figure reference | Commodity Study assumes Table implies Gap Spending Local demand at stake CON — Construction 62% 32% +30% $8.5M $2.6M ACC — Accommodation, food service, and recreation 100% (not stated) 38% +62% $1.6M $995,227 RET — Retail trade 100% (not stated) 32% +68% $912,000 $622,559 PRO — Professional and business services 100%... | 2024 |
| claim:102 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $8,500,000. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted near a table or figure reference | Commodity Study assumes Table implies Gap Spending Local demand at stake CON — Construction 62% 32% +30% $8.5M $2.6M ACC — Accommodation, food service, and recreation 100% (not stated) 38% +62% $1.6M $995,227 RET — Retail trade 100% (not stated) 32% +68% $912,000 $622,559 PRO — Professional and business services 100%... | 2024 |
| claim:103 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $2,578,995. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted near a table or figure reference | Construction: the study assumes 62% of this spending is met by local producers and this region's table implies 32% — 30% more local content than its structure supports, worth $2,578,995 of local final demand on $8,500,000 of spending. | 2024 |
| claim:104 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $8,500,000. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted near a table or figure reference | Construction: the study assumes 62% of this spending is met by local producers and this region's table implies 32% — 30% more local content than its structure supports, worth $2,578,995 of local final demand on $8,500,000 of spending. | 2024 |
| claim:105 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $1,596,000. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Accommodation, food service, and recreation: no local purchase percentage was stated, so all $1,596,000 of this spending was treated as locally produced. | 2024 |
| claim:106 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $912,000. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Retail trade: no local purchase percentage was stated, so all $912,000 of this spending was treated as locally produced. | 2024 |
| claim:107 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $304,000. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Professional and business services: no local purchase percentage was stated, so all $304,000 of this spending was treated as locally produced. | 2024 |
| claim:108 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $342,000. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Transportation and warehousing: no local purchase percentage was stated, so all $342,000 of this spending was treated as locally produced. | 2024 |
| claim:109 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $266,000. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | Health, education, and social services: no local purchase percentage was stated, so all $266,000 of this spending was treated as locally produced. | 2024 |
| claim:110 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Jobs claim: 34,250 jobs. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted near a table or figure reference | Figure Where it is stated Nearest tabulated figure $2.1M … spending the region would have seen anyway, so $2.1M of gross output was removed … $2.0M $11.2bn That report headlined an $11.2bn increase in the size of a … $1.85B $6.96bn … state's economy where its own value added was $6.96bn, a 61% overstatement produced …... | 2024 |
| claim:111 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $2.1M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted near a table or figure reference | Figure Where it is stated Nearest tabulated figure $2.1M … spending the region would have seen anyway, so $2.1M of gross output was removed … $2.0M $11.2bn That report headlined an $11.2bn increase in the size of a … $1.85B $6.96bn … state's economy where its own value added was $6.96bn, a 61% overstatement produced …... | 2024 |
| claim:112 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $2.0M. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted near a table or figure reference | Figure Where it is stated Nearest tabulated figure $2.1M … spending the region would have seen anyway, so $2.1M of gross output was removed … $2.0M $11.2bn That report headlined an $11.2bn increase in the size of a … $1.85B $6.96bn … state's economy where its own value added was $6.96bn, a 61% overstatement produced …... | 2024 |
| claim:113 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $11.2bn. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted near a table or figure reference | Figure Where it is stated Nearest tabulated figure $2.1M … spending the region would have seen anyway, so $2.1M of gross output was removed … $2.0M $11.2bn That report headlined an $11.2bn increase in the size of a … $1.85B $6.96bn … state's economy where its own value added was $6.96bn, a 61% overstatement produced …... | 2024 |
| claim:114 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $11.2bn. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted near a table or figure reference | Figure Where it is stated Nearest tabulated figure $2.1M … spending the region would have seen anyway, so $2.1M of gross output was removed … $2.0M $11.2bn That report headlined an $11.2bn increase in the size of a … $1.85B $6.96bn … state's economy where its own value added was $6.96bn, a 61% overstatement produced …... | 2024 |
| claim:115 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $1.85B. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted near a table or figure reference | Figure Where it is stated Nearest tabulated figure $2.1M … spending the region would have seen anyway, so $2.1M of gross output was removed … $2.0M $11.2bn That report headlined an $11.2bn increase in the size of a … $1.85B $6.96bn … state's economy where its own value added was $6.96bn, a 61% overstatement produced …... | 2024 |
| claim:116 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $6.96bn. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted near a table or figure reference | Figure Where it is stated Nearest tabulated figure $2.1M … spending the region would have seen anyway, so $2.1M of gross output was removed … $2.0M $11.2bn That report headlined an $11.2bn increase in the size of a … $1.85B $6.96bn … state's economy where its own value added was $6.96bn, a 61% overstatement produced …... | 2024 |
| claim:117 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Value added, comparable to local GDP claim: $477,274. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted near a table or figure reference | Figure Where it is stated Nearest tabulated figure $2.1M … spending the region would have seen anyway, so $2.1M of gross output was removed … $2.0M $11.2bn That report headlined an $11.2bn increase in the size of a … $1.85B $6.96bn … state's economy where its own value added was $6.96bn, a 61% overstatement produced …... | 2024 |
| claim:118 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Jobs claim: 20,000 jobs. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | regional employment: 20,000 jobs across 12 sectors from BLS QCEW; suppression: two suppressed cells filled from the state ratio for the same sector 3. | 2024 |
| claim:119 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $1. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | induced effects illustrative household closure at the accounts-implied consumption rate Lbar = (I - Abar)^-1 with a household row and column Local consumption per $1 of local labor income = $0.333, taken from the household column of the regional accounts rather than assumed. | 2024 |
| claim:120 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Labor income claim: $0.333. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | induced effects illustrative household closure at the accounts-implied consumption rate Lbar = (I - Abar)^-1 with a household row and column Local consumption per $1 of local labor income = $0.333, taken from the household column of the regional accounts rather than assumed. | 2024 |
| claim:121 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Output, a measure of activity not of wealth claim: $1. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | employment event: Facility staff estimated job count converted to industry output output = jobs / (jobs per $1 of output) The 22 stated jobs have the same output per worker as the regional average for ACC. | 2024 |
| claim:122 | Hypothesis evidence atom | no | neutral | Jobs claim: 1.25 jobs. | Carried into the audit claim inventory; quote only with the attached snippet, source clue, confidence, and gate results. | Extracted from report sentence | 1.25 workers and 2.4 people per household. | 2024 |
| missing_public_cost_side | Expected evidence our detector did not match | yes | adverse | Not matched by our detector: Public service costs, abatements, incentives, or other cost-side fiscal evidence. | Gross tax revenue may be mistaken for net fiscal benefit. | IMPLAN Audit Mode fiscal_truth_gate | — | — |
| missing_model_year | Expected evidence our detector did not match | yes | adverse | Not matched by our detector: Model year or data year. | Model structure may not match the spending period. | IMPLAN Audit Mode model_vintage_gate | — | — |
| missing_tax_retention_or_netting | Expected evidence our detector did not match | yes | adverse | Not matched by our detector: Gross-vs-net tax treatment and retention/abatement assumptions. | A gross tax collection can be mistaken for fiscal benefit to the decision maker. | IMPLAN Audit Mode tax_gross_vs_net_gate | — | — |
| weak_survey_coverage | Data quality penalty | no | adverse | Survey response coverage appears weak. | Primary inputs may be directionally biased or too sparse for the claimed precision. | IMPLAN Audit Mode survey_adequacy_gate | Survey coverage appears weak: 7 of 39 responses were detected. | — |
Counted by detector: 76% recall on held-out studies, about 4 in 10 flags not what was sought, and per-document recall observed across 67% to 87% with overlapping intervals. Full limits are stated above.
Gate Taxonomy
| Gate | Purpose | Required Evidence | Aliases |
|---|---|---|---|
| contribution_vs_impact_gate | Separate existing footprint, contribution, prospective impact, avoided loss, fiscal impact, and persuasion outcomes. | claim type, time frame, baseline, new-to-geography status, counterfactual for prospective impact | impact vs contribution, new jobs, retained jobs, counterfactual, but-for, economic contribution |
| fiscal_truth_gate | Keep gross tax output, net public revenue, public cost, incentive cost, and jurisdictional capture in separate lanes. | tax level, recipient jurisdiction, period, public cost side, gross/net label | fiscal truth, public revenue, tax benefit, net fiscal impact, jurisdictional capture |
| visitor_spending_gate | Test whether visitor spending is attributable, nonlocal, correctly margined, and not resident churn. | visitor volume, spend per visitor, origin split, local/nonlocal split, displacement treatment | visitor local split, nonlocal visitors, tourism spend, resident churn, retail margin |
| survey_adequacy_gate | Downgrade claims resting on weak, heterogeneous, or non-representative surveys. | sample frame, invited count, usable responses, response rate, weighting, collection dates | survey adequacy, sample size, response rate, proxy data, survey weighting |
| model_vintage_gate | Protect trend and update claims from stale or incomparable model years, dollar years, geographies, and sector schemes. | model year, source-data vintage, dollar year, deflator basis, sector scheme, geography | model vintage, data year, dollar year, inflation basis, trend comparability |
| geography_fit_gate | Test whether the model boundary matches the claim and whether sub-geography allocation is stated. | boundary definition, geography IDs, allocation method, local purchase assumptions, spillover treatment | geography fit, study area, decision geography, spillover, leakage |
| tax_gross_vs_net_gate | Catch mislabeled tax arithmetic wherever it appears. | tax base, rate or model source, recipient, period, construction/operations split, gross or net label | gross vs net tax, tax retention, abatement, incremental fiscal, recipient jurisdiction |
| benefit_cost_gate | Prevent ROI, BCR, payback, and public-return ratios from mixing economic activity with public benefit or omitting public cost. | numerator, denominator, payer, beneficiary, public cost, counterfactual, discount rate | BCA, ROI, benefit-cost ratio, payback, public return |
| source_confidence_gate | Set a claim floor from source type, provenance, vintage, and extractability. | source owner, vintage, locator, extraction method, checksum when known, attestation for client-supplied inputs | source confidence, OCR confidence, table recovery, checksum, client-supplied inputs |
Artifact Manifest And Hashes
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Source file | prt-synth-study.html |
| Source SHA-256 | 3f30c7ac85181e3f44508990e29e4eeb2672634c173662c3e9a2f59a4f868f1a |
| Extraction method | plain-text extraction |
| Audit contract | implan_audit_mode.v0 |
| Evidence surface contract | evidence_surface.v1 |
Per-artifact hashes are not embedded in this file: the manifest hashes this page, so it cannot contain its own digest. They are written to manifest.json beside this pack, one SHA-256 per artifact. A digest that no longer matches means the file was edited after the run, and the pack should not be treated as evidence of what the audit produced.
Negative results are detector results: not matched means not found at the current extraction and recall limits, not proof that the submitted study contains no such evidence. Only the contradicted section rests on text the document does contain.