Needs human adjudication: comparison is withheld because rank stability was not measured.
| Readiness | needs human adjudication |
| Client language | Automated comparison is withheld pending human adjudication: rank stability was not measured. |
| Allowed outputs | an internal triage list, not for a client; the reasons a comparison is withheld; what would have to change to allow a comparison; the machine-readable record for a reviewer |
| Not allowed | a ranking across the studies; which study sits above which; grouping into bands, without an exact order; language saying one study appears more qualified than another; a list of the source problems to repair first |
| Studies included | 2 |
| Studies excluded | 0 |
Every profile below is a measured reading of one study on its own terms — its source status, its claim count, how many of those claims carry a qualification near them — and none of it depends on the ranking that is withheld. 2 studies were read this way and are reportable individually. This pack may carry an internal triage list, not for a client; the reasons a comparison is withheld; what would have to change to allow a comparison; the machine-readable record for a reviewer.
What may not be concluded is any statement that one of these studies is better, stronger or more reliable than another. That is the comparison, and it is the thing this pack declines to make.
This table is not a client ranking. It tells the analyst where the evidence is thinnest before any cross-study claim travels.
| Study | Triage score | Flags | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Festival Impact Sample Audit | 11.6 | comparison profile derived from audit JSON; no human caveat labeling attached; claims with no qualification near them; a low qualification rate, on a detector whose precision is itself in question here; the detector may have missed qualifications here | Internal triage only, and not a client-publishable rank until comparison readiness clears. The flags beside this row say where the evidence is thinnest. |
| Airport Expansion Sample Audit | 8.1 | comparison profile derived from audit JSON; no human caveat labeling attached; a low qualification rate, on a detector whose precision is itself in question here; the detector may have missed qualifications here | Internal triage only, and not a client-publishable rank until comparison readiness clears. The flags beside this row say where the evidence is thinnest. |
Adjudicate additional qualification sentences: adjudicate about 131 additional sentences across 2 documents. The work reduces comparison uncertainty; it does not buy a different answer.