BIA, USDA, EDA, and foundation applications often live or die on a defensible economic and fiscal impact figure, and a number that assumes every local dollar recirculates forever reads as naive to a reviewer.
Who we serve: For lenders · For developers · For local governments · For tribes · For attorneys · For grant writers
We produce the economic-impact and fiscal analysis behind a BIA, USDA, EDA, or foundation application, for a grant writer working on contract or an economic development organization submitting on behalf of a jurisdiction. Every assumption is stated in plain language and the limits of the analysis are named up front, rather than buried in an appendix a reviewer skips.
We also audit a draft study before it goes in. We check the assumptions against the methodology a program reviewer actually applies and flag the multiplier or projection that reads as inflated, so the number you submit is one that holds up rather than one that comes back with questions.
A defensible number often separates a funded proposal from one that gets returned for revision. Program reviewers read many applications in a cycle and recognize the inflated multiplier or the double-counted job on sight.
We build every analysis on the public federal record and label each figure by method, source, and tier, so a reviewer can see where a number comes from. The work is human-reviewed, and because we work lean across the interior West, we can price the analysis to fit a grant budget instead of consuming it.
See the actual artifacts we deliver →
Writing a BIA, USDA, EDA, or foundation application? Tell us what the application needs, and we will lay out what the analysis takes, and what it costs.
Start a conversation