Project Red Team is the release gate for economic-impact claims. Whether you need a study produced, an existing one audited, or candidate sites compared, every engagement returns a record a reviewer can inspect, and a plain answer on what is safe to quote. Analyst-led throughout.
Six analyst-led offers built on one evidence engine. Each names what it delivers, what it does not do, and the decision it supports. Pricing is by scope; ask for a quote.
An analyst-led economic-impact and feasibility evidence pack for a project you are weighing. The engine builds the impact and viability read from the public statistical record, an analyst reviews every gate, and the pack states what is safe to quote and what is withheld. You get a plain release ruling with the numbers and their sources laid out, not a promise that the project pencils out.
A candidate-site or route-interval comparison that scores each location through the same gates on shared evidence. The engine samples the corridor, re-runs the study logic by candidate, and reports a provisional leader while holding a final pick until the ranking is stable across sampling density. An analyst reads the interval comparison and states the conditions that would flip the order.
A claim inventory and evidence review of a study you were handed, whether it came from IMPLAN, a consultant, an internal team, or an AI tool. We list every quantitative claim, trace what supports it, run the methodology gates, and mark which figures survive review and which are withheld. The ruling reports what the study can carry, and it does not rewrite the study to reach a kinder answer.
An aggregate RIMS II intake compared against the free-data model already built for the region, so you can see where a purchased multiplier and the public-record baseline agree and where they diverge. An analyst reads the two side by side, reports the size and direction of any gap, and states what the divergence means for the claims resting on it. This offer opens once the purchased RIMS files for the region are loaded.
Targeted data collection or adjudication aimed at a result the engine is currently withholding. When a gate fails or a figure lacks support, we scope the specific evidence that would let the analyst rule on it, then go collect or adjudicate it. This offer buys the evidence and a fresh read, and the result still depends on what that evidence turns out to say.
A scoped next-evidence plan drawn from the flip drivers, missing evidence, failed gates, and comparison instability found in a prior pack. An analyst reads what is holding a result back and lays out the specific work, sequence, and cost to address it. This offer scopes the work; it does not tell you which way to decide.
For what the engine does under each offer, see the capability map.